[ SAMSUNG ]
Mobile Processors
Samsung Exynos 2200
Overall Score
53/100
Key Technical Specifications
Processor (CPU)
472427
Graphics (GPU)
390230
[ EXPERT VERDICT · SUMMARY ]
Samsung Exynos 2200 is an engineering-tested mobile processors achieving an overall rating of 53/100. It is positioned for balanced everyday compute and power efficiency.
Benchmark Performance Scores
Normalized 0–100 Scale
NanoReview Score
Rating: Below Average
53/100
Performance
Rating: Below Average
51/100
Detailed Technical Specifications
3DMark
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Graphics test | 7 FPS |
| Section 1 | 18 FPS |
| Section 2 | 15 FPS |
| Section 3 | 12 FPS |
| Stability | 66% |
AI Accelerator
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Neural processor (NPU) | Yes |
AnTuTu 11
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| CPU | 472427 |
| GPU | 390230 |
| Memory | 216173 |
| Total score | 1434169 |
| UX | 355339 |
CPU
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Architecture | 1x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-X23x 2.52 GHz – Cortex-A7104x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A510 |
| Cores | 8 |
| Frequency | 2800 MHz |
| Instruction set | ARMv9-A |
| L3 cache | 4 MB |
| Manufacturing | Samsung |
| Process | 4 nanometers |
| TDP (Sustained Power Limit) | 7 W |
Connectivity
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| 4G support | LTE Cat. 24 |
| 5G support | Yes |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 |
| Download speed | Up to 7350 Mbps |
| Modem | Exynos 5300 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC |
| Upload speed | Up to 3670 Mbps |
| Wi-Fi | 6 |
GeekBench 6
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| API | Vulkan |
| Asset compression | 169.2 MB/sec |
| Background blur | 14.7 images/sec |
| Edge detection | 0.36 Gpixels/sec |
| Face detection | 9.75 images/sec |
| Feature matching | 0.15 Gpixels/sec |
| Gaussian blur | 0.48 Gpixels/sec |
| HDR | 130.8 Mpixels/sec |
| HTML 5 Browser | 103 pages/sec |
| Horizon detection | 0.41 Gpixels/sec |
| Image detection | 101.3 images/sec |
| PDF Renderer | 133.7 Mpixels/sec |
| Particle physics | 1860.5 FPS |
| Photo processing | 34.9 images/sec |
| Ray tracing | 4.65 Mpixels/sec |
| Samples | 25 tests |
| Stereo matching | 38.1 Gpixels/sec |
Graphics
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| DirectX version | 12.1 |
| FLOPS | 1003 Gigaflops |
| GPU frequency | 1306 MHz |
| OpenCL version | 2.0 |
| Pipelines | 3 |
| Shading units | 128 |
| Total shaders | 384 |
| Vulkan version | 1.3 |
Info
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Announced | January 2022 |
| Class | Flagship |
| Model number | S5E9925 |
| Official page | Samsung Exynos 2200 official site |
| Successor | -Samsung Exynos 2500 |
Memory
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Bus | 4x 16 Bit |
| Max bandwidth | 51.2 Gb/s |
| Max size | 24 GB |
| Memory frequency | 3200 MHz |
| Memory type | LPDDR5 |
Multimedia (ISP)
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Audio codecs | - AAC- AIFF- CAF- MP3- MP4- WAV |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 200MP |
| Max display resolution | 3840 x 2160 |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 |
| Video capture | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264- H.265- AV1- VP9 |
| Video playback | 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 240FPS |
PCMark 3.0
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Data manipulation score | 12323 |
| Phones tested | 4 models |
| Photo editing score | 24230 |
| Video editing score | 7385 |
| Web score | 11932 |
| Writing score | 16664 |
Recent User Tests
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Date | Benchmark |
| 📘 2026-06-09(Unknown) | AnTuTu |
| 📘 2026-07-03(Akemi) | AnTuTu |
| 📘 2026-07-03->Otchem1488 | AnTuTu |
| 📘 2026-07-08(Wertix) | AnTuTu |
| 📘 2026-07-09(Clem) | GeekBench GPU |
| 📘 2026-07-12(João_Rosário_67) | AnTuTu |
| 📘 2026-07-21(RAID_0) | GeekBench GPU |
| 📘 2026-07-26(Relakser) | AnTuTu |
Smartphones
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| 1.Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (Exynos) | 1479904 |
| 2.Samsung Galaxy S22 Plus | 1456410 |
| 3.Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra | 1434169 |
| 4.Samsung Galaxy S22 | 1398273 |
| Phones with Exynos 2200 | AnTuTu v11 |
Strengths & Limitations
Key Advantages
- Comprehensive positive benchmark metrics recorded.
Key Considerations
- No major hardware limitations flagged during benchmark run.
Direct Competitors & Alternatives
XIAOMI
Xiaomi Xring O3
100/100
Compare →
APPLE
Apple M4 (iPad)
99/100
Compare →
APPLE
Apple M5 (iPad)
99/100
Compare →
APPLE
Apple M3 (iPad)
97/100
Compare →
Methodology, Provenance & Verification
Score version 2026.1 · Data verified 2026-08-26 · Source: official manufacturer datasheets and standardized reproducible benchmark suites (Geekbench 6, Cinebench R24, 3DMark).