[ SAMSUNG ]
Mobile Processors
Samsung Exynos 990
Overall Score
40/100
Key Technical Specifications
Processor (CPU)
370196
Graphics (GPU)
130687
[ EXPERT VERDICT · SUMMARY ]
Samsung Exynos 990 is an engineering-tested mobile processors achieving an overall rating of 40/100. It is positioned for balanced everyday compute and power efficiency.
Benchmark Performance Scores
Normalized 0–100 Scale
NanoReview Score
Rating: Poor
40/100
Performance
Rating: Poor
39/100
Detailed Technical Specifications
3DMark
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Graphics test | 3 FPS |
| Stability | 73% |
AI Accelerator
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| NPU theoretical performance | 15 TOPS |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Yes |
AnTuTu 11
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| CPU | 370196 |
| GPU | 130687 |
| Memory | 151878 |
| Total score | 907140 |
| UX | 254379 |
CPU
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Architecture | 2x 2.73 GHz – Exynos M52x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A764x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Cores | 8 |
| Frequency | 2730 MHz |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.2-A |
| L1 cache | 192 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 2 MB |
| Manufacturing | Samsung |
| Process | 7 nanometers |
| TDP (Sustained Power Limit) | 9 W |
Connectivity
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| 4G support | LTE Cat. 24 |
| 5G support | Yes |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 |
| Download speed | Up to 7350 Mbps |
| Modem | Exynos 5123 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo |
| Upload speed | Up to 3670 Mbps |
| Wi-Fi | 6 |
GeekBench 6
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| API | OpenCL |
| Asset compression | 139.9 MB/sec |
| Background blur | 10.4 images/sec |
| Edge detection | 0.34 Gpixels/sec |
| Face detection | 3.84 images/sec |
| Feature matching | 0.07 Gpixels/sec |
| Gaussian blur | 0.27 Gpixels/sec |
| HDR | 98.7 Mpixels/sec |
| HTML 5 Browser | 80.6 pages/sec |
| Horizon detection | 0.25 Gpixels/sec |
| Image detection | 66.4 images/sec |
| PDF Renderer | 99.8 Mpixels/sec |
| Particle physics | 955.5 FPS |
| Photo processing | 30.6 images/sec |
| Ray tracing | 3.92 Mpixels/sec |
| Samples | 20 tests |
| Stereo matching | 15.8 Gpixels/sec |
Graphics
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| FLOPS | 585.7 Gigaflops |
| GPU frequency | 832 MHz |
| OpenCL version | 2.0 |
| Pipelines | 11 |
| Shading units | 32 |
| Total shaders | 352 |
| Vulkan version | 1.3 |
Info
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Announced | October 2019 |
| Class | Flagship |
| Model number | S5E9830 |
| Official page | Samsung Exynos 990 official site |
| Successor | -Samsung Exynos 2500 |
Memory
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Bus | 4x 16 Bit |
| Max bandwidth | 44 Gb/s |
| Max size | 16 GB |
| Memory frequency | 2750 MHz |
| Memory type | LPDDR5 |
Multimedia (ISP)
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Audio codecs | - AAC- AIFF- CAF- MP3- MP4- WAV |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 108MP, 2x 25MP |
| Max display resolution | 3840 x 2400 |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1, UFS 3.0 |
| Video capture | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264- H.265- VP8- VP9 |
| Video playback | 8K at 30FPS |
PCMark 3.0
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Data manipulation score | 8823 |
| Phones tested | 6 models |
| Photo editing score | 30928 |
| Video editing score | 6884 |
| Web score | 10705 |
| Writing score | 11422 |
Recent User Tests
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Date | Benchmark |
| 📘 2026-06-20(Rei Zero) | AnTuTu |
| 📘 2026-06-24(Yiannis Mihai) | AnTuTu |
| 📘 2026-07-09(SamsungS8hype) | AnTuTu |
| 📘 2026-07-16(Vinny) | AnTuTu |
| 📘 2026-07-24(Ctvy970) | AnTuTu |
| 📘 2026-08-05(Chryso27) | AnTuTu |
| 📘 2026-08-14(TimFire) | AnTuTu |
| 📘 2026-08-16->SamsungS8Hype | AnTuTu |
Smartphones
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| 1.Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra | 918508 |
| 2.Samsung Galaxy Note 20 | 913920 |
| 3.Samsung Galaxy S20 FE | 909679 |
| 4.Samsung Galaxy S20 | 907140 |
| 5.Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra | 901346 |
| 6.Samsung Galaxy S20 Plus | 874382 |
| Phones with Exynos 990 | AnTuTu v11 |
Strengths & Limitations
Key Advantages
- Comprehensive positive benchmark metrics recorded.
Key Considerations
- No major hardware limitations flagged during benchmark run.
Direct Competitors & Alternatives
XIAOMI
Xiaomi Xring O3
100/100
Compare →
APPLE
Apple M4 (iPad)
99/100
Compare →
APPLE
Apple M5 (iPad)
99/100
Compare →
APPLE
Apple M3 (iPad)
97/100
Compare →
Methodology, Provenance & Verification
Score version 2026.1 · Data verified 2026-08-26 · Source: official manufacturer datasheets and standardized reproducible benchmark suites (Geekbench 6, Cinebench R24, 3DMark).