[ QUALCOMM ]
Mobile Processors
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
Overall Score
24/100
Key Technical Specifications
Processor (CPU)
147902
Graphics (GPU)
24130
[ EXPERT VERDICT · SUMMARY ]
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 is an engineering-tested mobile processors achieving an overall rating of 24/100. It is positioned for balanced everyday compute and power efficiency.
Benchmark Performance Scores
Normalized 0–100 Scale
NanoReview Score
Rating: Poor
24/100
Performance
Rating: Poor
15/100
Detailed Technical Specifications
AI Accelerator
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Neural processor (NPU) | Hexagon 686 |
AnTuTu 11
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| CPU | 147902 |
| GPU | 24130 |
| Memory | 68847 |
| Total score | 329457 |
| UX | 88578 |
CPU
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Architecture | 4x 2 GHz – Kryo 260 Gold (Cortex-A73)4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 260 Silver (Cortex-A53) |
| Cores | 8 |
| Frequency | 2000 MHz |
| Instruction set | ARMv8-A |
| Manufacturing | Samsung |
| Process | 11 nanometers |
| TDP (Sustained Power Limit) | 5 W |
| Transistor count | 1.75 billion |
Connectivity
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| 4G support | LTE Cat. 13 |
| 5G support | No |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 |
| Download speed | Up to 600 Mbps |
| Modem | X12 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS |
| Upload speed | Up to 150 Mbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 |
Gaming
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Call of Duty: Mobile | 28 FPS[Ultra] |
| Device | Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T1080 x 2340 |
| Fortnite | 27 FPS[Low] |
| Mobile Legends: Bang Bang | 30 FPS[High] |
| PUBG Mobile | 29 FPS[Low] |
| Shadowgun Legends | 53 FPS[Low] |
| World of Tanks Blitz | 57 FPS[Medium] |
GeekBench 6
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| API | OpenCL |
| Asset compression | 67.9 MB/sec |
| Background blur | 1.82 images/sec |
| Edge detection | 0.04 Gpixels/sec |
| Face detection | 0.14 images/sec |
| Gaussian blur | 0.02 Gpixels/sec |
| HDR | 44.1 Mpixels/sec |
| HTML 5 Browser | 40.2 pages/sec |
| Horizon detection | 0.02 Gpixels/sec |
| Image detection | 12.7 images/sec |
| PDF Renderer | 48.5 Mpixels/sec |
| Particle physics | 22.5 FPS |
| Photo processing | 8.45 images/sec |
| Ray tracing | 1.66 Mpixels/sec |
| Samples | 2 tests |
| Stereo matching | 1.24 Gpixels/sec |
Graphics
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| DirectX version | 12.1 |
| FLOPS | 243.2 Gigaflops |
| GPU frequency | 950 MHz |
| OpenCL version | 2.0 |
| Pipelines | 1 |
| Shading units | 128 |
| Total shaders | 128 |
| Vulkan version | 1.1 |
Info
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Announced | April 2019 |
| Class | Mid range |
| Model number | SM6125 |
| Official page | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 official site |
| Successor | -Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 |
Memory
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Bus | 2x 16 Bit |
| Max bandwidth | 14.9 Gb/s |
| Max size | 8 GB |
| Memory frequency | 1866 MHz |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X |
Multimedia (ISP)
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Audio codecs | - AIFF- CAF- MP3- MP4- WAV |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 16MP |
| Max display resolution | 2520 x 1080 |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1 |
| Video capture | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264- H.265- VP8- VP9 |
| Video playback | 4K at 30FPS |
PCMark 3.0
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Data manipulation score | 5151 |
| Phones tested | 2 models |
| Photo editing score | 11822 |
| Video editing score | 5062 |
| Web score | 6072 |
| Writing score | 6677 |
Recent User Tests
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Date | Benchmark |
| 📘 2024-08-10(kyklisheee) | GeekBench GPU |
| 📘 2025-10-29(Baster) | AnTuTu |
| 📘 2025-11-13->Lol | AnTuTu |
| 📘 2026-05-09->Nurs | AnTuTu |
| 📘 2026-05-10->Nurs | AnTuTu |
| 📘 2026-06-05(Thomas 🇧🇷) | AnTuTu |
| 📘 2026-07-10(bang) | AnTuTu |
| 📘 2026-08-17(SR Saani) | AnTuTu |
Smartphones
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| 1.Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T | 350459 |
| 2.Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 | 329457 |
| Phones with Snapdragon 665 | AnTuTu v11 |
Strengths & Limitations
Key Advantages
- Comprehensive positive benchmark metrics recorded.
Key Considerations
- No major hardware limitations flagged during benchmark run.
Direct Competitors & Alternatives
XIAOMI
Xiaomi Xring O3
100/100
Compare →
APPLE
Apple M4 (iPad)
99/100
Compare →
APPLE
Apple M5 (iPad)
99/100
Compare →
APPLE
Apple M3 (iPad)
97/100
Compare →
Methodology, Provenance & Verification
Score version 2026.1 · Data verified 2026-08-26 · Source: official manufacturer datasheets and standardized reproducible benchmark suites (Geekbench 6, Cinebench R24, 3DMark).