[ QUALCOMM ]
Mobile Processors
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
Overall Score
24/100
Key Technical Specifications
Processor (CPU)
142183
Graphics (GPU)
23170
[ EXPERT VERDICT · SUMMARY ]
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 is an engineering-tested mobile processors achieving an overall rating of 24/100. It is positioned for balanced everyday compute and power efficiency.
Benchmark Performance Scores
Normalized 0–100 Scale
NanoReview Score
Rating: Poor
24/100
Performance
Rating: Poor
15/100
Detailed Technical Specifications
AI Accelerator
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Neural processor (NPU) | Hexagon 683 |
AnTuTu 11
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| CPU | 142183 |
| GPU | 23170 |
| Memory | 70502 |
| Total score | 320666 |
| UX | 84811 |
CPU
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Architecture | 4x 2 GHz – Kryo 260 Gold (Cortex-A73)4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 260 Silver (Cortex-A53) |
| Cores | 8 |
| Frequency | 2000 MHz |
| Instruction set | ARMv8-A |
| Manufacturing | Samsung |
| Process | 11 nanometers |
| TDP (Sustained Power Limit) | 4 W |
| Transistor count | 1.75 billion |
Connectivity
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| 4G support | LTE Cat. 13 |
| 5G support | No |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 |
| Download speed | Up to 390 Mbps |
| Modem | X11 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC |
| Upload speed | Up to 150 Mbps |
| Wi-Fi | 6 |
Gaming
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Call of Duty: Mobile | 30 FPS[Ultra] |
| Device | Xiaomi Poco M31080 x 2340 |
| Fortnite | 26 FPS[Low] |
| Mobile Legends: Bang Bang | 30 FPS[High] |
| PUBG Mobile | 28 FPS[Low] |
| Shadowgun Legends | 54 FPS[Low] |
| World of Tanks Blitz | 59 FPS[Medium] |
GeekBench 6
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| API | OpenCL |
| Asset compression | 74.2 MB/sec |
| Background blur | 1.65 images/sec |
| Edge detection | 0.04 Gpixels/sec |
| Face detection | 0.14 images/sec |
| Gaussian blur | 0.02 Gpixels/sec |
| HDR | 41.5 Mpixels/sec |
| HTML 5 Browser | 37.2 pages/sec |
| Horizon detection | 0.02 Gpixels/sec |
| Image detection | 12.8 images/sec |
| PDF Renderer | 38.5 Mpixels/sec |
| Particle physics | 23.5 FPS |
| Photo processing | 8.62 images/sec |
| Ray tracing | 1.97 Mpixels/sec |
| Samples | 6 tests |
| Stereo matching | 1.24 Gpixels/sec |
Graphics
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| DirectX version | 12.1 |
| FLOPS | 243.2 Gigaflops |
| GPU frequency | 950 MHz |
| OpenCL version | 2.0 |
| Pipelines | 1 |
| Shading units | 128 |
| Total shaders | 128 |
| Vulkan version | 1.1 |
Info
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Announced | January 2020 |
| Class | Mid range |
| Model number | SM6115 |
| Official page | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 official site |
| Successor | -Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 |
Memory
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Bus | 2x 16 Bit |
| Max bandwidth | 13.9 Gb/s |
| Max size | 8 GB |
| Memory frequency | 1866 MHz |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X |
Multimedia (ISP)
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Audio codecs | - AIFF- CAF- MP3- MP4- WAV |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 16MP |
| Max display resolution | 2520 x 1080 |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1 |
| Video capture | 1K at 60FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264- H.265- VP9 |
| Video playback | 1080p at 60FPS |
PCMark 3.0
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Data manipulation score | 5241 |
| Phones tested | 3 models |
| Photo editing score | 12485 |
| Video editing score | 3680 |
| Web score | 5767 |
| Writing score | 7187 |
Recent User Tests
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Date | Benchmark |
| 📘 2026-01-02(EyesNeverlies) | AnTuTu |
| 📘 2026-03-13(Linode) | GeekBench CPU |
| 📘 2026-04-06(Linode) | AnTuTu |
| 📘 2026-04-07(Fahim) | AnTuTu |
| 📘 2026-05-29(arsts) | AnTuTu |
| 📘 2026-06-04(Wayne) | AnTuTu |
Smartphones
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| 1.Xiaomi Poco M3 | 325844 |
| 2.Xiaomi Redmi 9T | 314539 |
| 3.Motorola Moto G30 | 238865 |
| 4.Motorola Moto G Power (2021) | - |
| Phones with Snapdragon 662 | AnTuTu v11 |
Strengths & Limitations
Key Advantages
- Comprehensive positive benchmark metrics recorded.
Key Considerations
- No major hardware limitations flagged during benchmark run.
Direct Competitors & Alternatives
XIAOMI
Xiaomi Xring O3
100/100
Compare →
APPLE
Apple M4 (iPad)
99/100
Compare →
APPLE
Apple M5 (iPad)
99/100
Compare →
APPLE
Apple M3 (iPad)
97/100
Compare →
Methodology, Provenance & Verification
Score version 2026.1 · Data verified 2026-08-26 · Source: official manufacturer datasheets and standardized reproducible benchmark suites (Geekbench 6, Cinebench R24, 3DMark).