[ XIAOMI ]
Smartphones
Xiaomi Mi 9
Overall Score
48/100
Key Technical Specifications
Processor (CPU)
327134
Graphics (GPU)
129608
[ EXPERT VERDICT · SUMMARY ]
Xiaomi Mi 9 is an engineering-tested smartphones achieving an overall rating of 48/100. It is positioned for balanced everyday compute and power efficiency.
Benchmark Performance Scores
Normalized 0–100 Scale
Gaming
Rating: Poor
24/100
NanoReview Score
Rating: Poor
48/100
Performance
Rating: Poor
40/100
Detailed Technical Specifications
Battery
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Battery type | Li-Po |
| Capacity | 3300 mAh |
| Fast charging | Yes, Quick Charge 4 (50% in 30 min) |
| Full charging time | 1:30 hr |
| Gaming | 04:07 hr |
| Max charge power | 27 W |
| Replaceable | No |
| Reverse charging | No |
| Standby | 83 hr |
| Watching video | 11:37 hr |
| Web browsing | 06:08 hr |
| Wireless charging | Yes (20 W) |
Benchmarks
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| CPU | 327134 |
| Compute Score (GPU) | 3553 |
| Data manipulation | 7804 |
| GPU | 129608 |
| Graphics score | 877 |
| Graphics test | 5 FPS |
| Memory | 142341 |
| Multi-core score | 2929 |
| Photo editing | 25498 |
| Single-core score | 1000 |
| Stability | 86% |
| Total score | 786843 |
| UX | 187760 |
| Video editing | 6701 |
| Web score | 7583 |
| Writing score | 13260 |
Connectivity
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| 2G network | GSM 850, GSM 900, GSM 1800, GSM 1900 |
| 3G network | HSDPA 850, HSDPA 900, HSDPA 1900, HSDPA 2100 |
| 4G network | LTE 2100, LTE 800, LTE 1800, LTE 2600, LTE 900, LTE 2300, LTE 2500 |
| 5G support | No |
| Bluetooth features | LE, A2DP |
| Bluetooth version | 5 |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo |
| Hybrid slot | No |
| Infrared port | Yes |
| LTE Cat* | 20 |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby |
| NFC* | Yes |
| Number of SIM* | 2 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano |
| USB features | - Charging- USB-Storage mode- USB-Host mode- OTG |
| USB type | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band- Wi-Fi Direct- Wi-Fi Hotspot- Wi-Fi Display |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| eSIM support* | No |
Design and build
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Purple |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-display |
| Frame material | Metal |
| Height | 157.5 mm (6.2 inches) |
| Rear material | Glass |
| Thickness | 7.6 mm (0.3 inches) |
| Waterproof | No |
| Weight | 173 g (6.1 oz) |
| Width | 74.6 mm (2.94 inches) |
Display
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Adaptive refresh rate | No |
| Aspect ratio | 19.5:9 |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinity |
| Display features | - Always-On Display- DC Dimming |
| HDR support | Yes, HDR10 |
| Max rated brightness | 600 nits |
| PPI | 403 ppi |
| PWM | 245 Hz |
| RGB color space | 95.4% |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels |
| Response time | 4.2 ms |
| Screen protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.3% |
| Size | 6.39 inches |
| Type | AMOLED |
DxOMark main camera tests
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Samples | Photo samples of Xiaomi Mi 9 from DxOMark |
Main camera
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS |
| 4K video recording | Up to 60FPS |
| 8K video recording | No |
| Angle of widest lens | 117° |
| Aperture | f/1.8 |
| Autofocus | Laser autofocus |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode- Pro mode- RAW support |
| Flash | Dual LED |
| Focal length | 27 mm |
| Image resolution | 8000 x 6000 |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 48 MP2) Telephoto: 12 MP3) Ultrawide: 16 MP |
| Matrix | 48 megapixels |
| Pixel size | 0.8 micron |
| Sensor | Sony IMX586 |
| Sensor size | 1/2" (≈ 0.5 inch) |
| Slow motion | 960 FPS (1080p) |
| Stabilization | Digital |
| Zoom | Optical, 2x |
Memory
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Channels | 2 |
| Memory card | No |
| Memory clock | 2133 MHz |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X |
| RAM size | 6 GB |
| Storage size | 64 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 |
Other
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Announced | February 2019 |
| Category | Flagship |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $460 |
| Release date | April 2019 |
| SAR (body) | 0.99 W/kg |
| SAR (head) | 1.389 W/kg |
| Sensors | - Hall-effect sensor- Barometer- Proximity sensor- Gyroscope- Accelerometer- Ambient light sensor- Compass- Fingerprint |
| Successor | -Xiaomi 17 |
Performance
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Architecture | - 4 cores at 1.8 GHz: Cortex-A55 (Kryo 485 Silver)- 3 cores at 2.42 GHz: Cortex-A76 (Kryo 485 Gold)- 1 core at 2.84 GHz: Cortex-A76 (Kryo 485 Gold) |
| CPU cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 |
| FLOPS | ~898.5 GFLOPS |
| GPU clock | 585 MHz |
| GPU shading units | 768 |
| Graphics | Adreno 640 |
| L3 cache | 2 MB |
| Lithography process | 7 nanometers |
| Manufacturing | TSMC |
| Max clock | 2840 MHz |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Hexagon 690 |
Recent User Tests
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Date | Benchmark |
| 📘 2024-11-06(Pon 2) | GeekBench GPU |
| 📘 2024-12-18(mi9user_perdun) | GeekBench GPU |
| 📘 2025-11-02(Rauful) | AnTuTu |
| 📘 2025-12-08(Imam Mawardi) | AnTuTu |
| 📘 2026-02-05(A13) | AnTuTu |
| 📘 2026-02-22(A13) | AnTuTu |
Selfie camera
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No |
| Megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS |
Software
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| OS size | 13.5 GB |
| Operating system | Android 9.0 (Can be upgraded to Android 11) |
| ROM | MIUI 12.5 |
Sound
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Dolby Atmos | No |
| FM radio | No |
| Headphone audio jack | No |
| Speakers | Mono |
Strengths & Limitations
Key Advantages
- Comprehensive positive benchmark metrics recorded.
Key Considerations
- No major hardware limitations flagged during benchmark run.
Direct Competitors & Alternatives
OPPO
Oppo Find X9 Ultra
96/100
Compare →
HONOR
Honor Magic 8 Pro
94/100
Compare →
OPPO
Oppo Find X9 Pro
94/100
Compare →
ONEPLUS
OnePlus 15
93/100
Compare →
Methodology, Provenance & Verification
Score version 2026.1 · Data verified 2026-08-26 · Source: official manufacturer datasheets and standardized reproducible benchmark suites (Geekbench 6, Cinebench R24, 3DMark).