HiSilicon Kirin 8020 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5

[ VERDICT ] Winner: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (97/100)

Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 leads overall with a score of 97/100 compared to HiSilicon Kirin 8020 (44/100), offering superior measured performance and technical specifications.

Why choose Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5:
  • + Higher DeviceBenchmark Score score (97 vs 44)
  • + Higher Performance score (99 vs 46)

Benchmark Performance Comparison

Normalized Lab Scores
Benchmark measurements and scores across compared devices
Benchmark HiSilicon Kirin 8020 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
DeviceBenchmark Score 44.0 Poor 97.0 Excellent WINNER
Performance 46.0 Poor 99.0 Excellent WINNER

Detailed Technical Specifications

3DMark

3DMark specifications comparison
Specification HiSilicon Kirin 8020 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
Graphics test 4 FPS 20 FPS
Section 1 — 52 FPS
Section 2 — 46 FPS
Section 3 — 40 FPS
Stability — 67%

AI Accelerator

AI Accelerator specifications comparison
Specification HiSilicon Kirin 8020 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
Neural processor (NPU) Da Vinci Hexagon

AnTuTu 11

AnTuTu 11 specifications comparison
Specification HiSilicon Kirin 8020 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
CPU 510762 1112833
GPU 139259 1494722
Memory 243962 442350
Total score 1146138 3950082
UX 252155 900177

CPU

CPU specifications comparison
Specification HiSilicon Kirin 8020 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
Architecture 1x 2.285 GHz –3x 2.05 GHz –4x 1.3 GHz – 2x 4.61 GHz – Oryon Gen 3 Prime6x 3.63 GHz – Oryon Gen 3 Performance
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2285 MHz 4610 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8-A ARMv9.2-A
Manufacturing SMIC TSMC
Process 7 nanometers 3 nanometers
L1 cache — 192 KB
L2 cache — 12 MB
L3 cache — 12 MB

Connectivity

Connectivity specifications comparison
Specification HiSilicon Kirin 8020 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
5G support Yes Yes
Bluetooth 5.4 6.0
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Wi-Fi 7 7
4G support — LTE Cat. 24
Download speed — Up to 12500 Mbps
Modem — Snapdragon X85
Upload speed — Up to 3700 Mbps

GeekBench 6

GeekBench 6 specifications comparison
Specification HiSilicon Kirin 8020 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
API Vulkan Vulkan
Asset compression 155.7 MB/sec 421.8 MB/sec
Background blur 11.9 images/sec 40.7 images/sec
Edge detection 0.19 Gpixels/sec 1 Gpixels/sec
Face detection 1.76 images/sec 24.9 images/sec
Feature matching 0.02 Gpixels/sec 0.36 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.13 Gpixels/sec 2.04 Gpixels/sec
HDR 95.4 Mpixels/sec 308.4 Mpixels/sec
HTML 5 Browser 101.3 pages/sec 238 pages/sec
Horizon detection 0.13 Gpixels/sec 0.72 Gpixels/sec
Image detection 60.2 images/sec 330.6 images/sec
PDF Renderer 117.6 Mpixels/sec 286.6 Mpixels/sec
Particle physics 299.5 FPS 4390.2 FPS
Photo processing 34.7 images/sec 98.7 images/sec
Ray tracing 4.78 Mpixels/sec 14.1 Mpixels/sec
Samples 3 tests 79 tests
Stereo matching 10.7 Gpixels/sec 115.4 Gpixels/sec

Graphics

Graphics specifications comparison
Specification HiSilicon Kirin 8020 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
DirectX version 12 12.1
FLOPS 860.2 Gigaflops 3686.4 Gigaflops
GPU frequency 840 MHz 1200 MHz
OpenCL version 3.0 3.0
Pipelines 4 3
Shading units 256 512
Total shaders 1024 1536
Vulkan version 1.3 1.4

Info

Info specifications comparison
Specification HiSilicon Kirin 8020 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
Announced May 2025 September 2025
Class Mid range Flagship
Model number — SM8850-AC
Official page — Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 official site

Memory

Memory specifications comparison
Specification HiSilicon Kirin 8020 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 68.2 Gb/s 84.8 Gb/s
Max size 16 GB 24 GB
Memory frequency 4266 MHz 5300 MHz
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X

Multimedia (ISP)

Multimedia (ISP) specifications comparison
Specification HiSilicon Kirin 8020 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
Audio codecs - AAC- AIFF- CAF- MP3- MP4- WAV - AAC- AIFF- CAF- MP3- MP4- WAV
Storage type UFS 4.0 UFS 4.0, UFS 4.1
Video capture 4K at 60FPS, 1K at 120FPS 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video codecs - H.264- H.265- VP9 - H.264- H.265- AV1- VP8- VP9
Video playback 4K at 60FPS, 1080p at 120FPS 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Max camera resolution — 1x 320MP
Max display resolution — 3840 x 2540

Recent User Tests

Recent User Tests specifications comparison
Specification HiSilicon Kirin 8020 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
Date Benchmark Benchmark
📘 2025-06-15(Huwi_hype) GeekBench CPU —
📘 2026-01-16(S_Bass) AnTuTu —
📘 2026-03-26(diesel532) AnTuTu —
📘 2026-04-09(胡一叮) AnTuTu —
📘 2026-04-11(yang) AnTuTu —
📘 2026-08-19->2295031556Leon — AnTuTu
📘 2026-08-21(Ilya) — AnTuTu
📘 2026-08-24(q_l8) — AnTuTu
📘 2026-08-24->Ang3L4D — AnTuTu
📘 2026-08-25(Edwin3q) — AnTuTu
📘 2026-08-25(Hüseyn Alizade) — AnTuTu
📘 2026-08-25(erosado-pr) — AnTuTu
📘 2026-08-25(freqr) — AnTuTu

Smartphones

Smartphones specifications comparison
Specification HiSilicon Kirin 8020 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
1.Huawei Nova 14 Ultra 1156650 —
2.Huawei nova 16z 1146138 —
3.Huawei Nova 15 1033121 —
4.Huawei Nova 14 Pro 1021894 —
Phones with Kirin 8020 AnTuTu v11 —
1.ZTE Nubia Red Magic 11S Pro Plus — 4716234
10.Honor Magic 8 — 4037547
2.ZTE Nubia Red Magic 11S Pro — 4678468
3.Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra — 4602290
4.Vivo X300 Ultra — 4247433
5.ZTE Nubia Red Magic 11 Pro Plus — 4244509
6.Oppo Find X9 Ultra — 4231988
7.Honor Robot Phone — 4166339
8.Honor Magic V6 — 4166339
9.ZTE Nubia Red Magic 11 Pro — 4117238
Phones with Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 — AnTuTu v11

PCMark 3.0

PCMark 3.0 specifications comparison
Specification HiSilicon Kirin 8020 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
Data manipulation score — 15949
Phones tested — 13 models
Photo editing score — 40273
Video editing score — 8052
Web score — 16855
Writing score — 26073

Looking for More Comparisons?

Browse all available head-to-head comparisons or select new devices in the comparison hub.

HiSilicon Kirin 8020 vs Xiaomi Xring O3 HiSilicon Kirin 8020 vs Apple M4 (iPad) HiSilicon Kirin 8020 vs Apple M5 (iPad) HiSilicon Kirin 8020 vs Apple M3 (iPad)
Browse Mobile Processors Comparisons → Launch Full Comparison Hub →