Oppo Find X9 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

[ VERDICT ] Winner: Oppo Find X9 Pro (94/100)

Oppo Find X9 Pro leads overall with a score of 94/100 compared to Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (82/100), offering superior measured performance and technical specifications.

Benchmark Performance Comparison

Normalized Lab Scores
Benchmark measurements and scores across compared devices
Benchmark Oppo Find X9 Pro Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Gaming 94.0 Excellent WINNER 85.0 Very Good
NanoReview Score 94.0 Excellent WINNER 82.0 Very Good
Performance 97.0 Excellent WINNER 95.0 Excellent

Detailed Technical Specifications

Battery

Battery specifications comparison
Specification Oppo Find X9 Pro Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Battery cycles 1300 cycles
Battery type Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) Li-Po
Bypass charging Yes Yes
Capacity 7500 mAh 5600 mAh
Fast charging Yes (54% in 30 min) Yes (50% in 30 min)
Full charging time 1:20 hr
Gaming 10:24 hr
Max charge power 80 W 45 W
Replaceable No No
Reverse charging Yes, (wireless) Yes, (wireless)
Standby 107 hr
Watching video 25:00 hr
Web browsing 19:04 hr
Wireless charging Yes (50 W) Yes (15 W)

Benchmarks

Benchmarks specifications comparison
Specification Oppo Find X9 Pro Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
CPU 1098383 803775
Compute Score (GPU) 26944
Data manipulation 13395
GPU 1275843 964888
Graphics score 3009
Graphics test 22 FPS
Memory 378116 494729
Multi-core score 10065 9710
Photo editing 22747
Section 1 55 FPS
Section 2 52 FPS
Section 3 43 FPS
Single-core score 3422 3018
Stability 52%
Total score 3508681 2926532
UX 756339 663140
Video editing 5850
Web score 11183
Writing score 19055

Connectivity

Connectivity specifications comparison
Specification Oppo Find X9 Pro Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
2G network GSM 850/900/1800MHz GSM850, GSM900, DCS1800, PCS1900
3G network WCDMA 1/2/4/5/6/8/19 UMTS B1(2100), B2(1900), B4(AWS), B5(850), B8(900)
4G network LTE 1/2/3/4/5/7/8/12/17/18/19/20/25/26/28/66 B1(2100), B2(1900), B3(1800), B4(AWS), B5(850), B7(2600), B8(900), B12(700), B13(700), B17(700), B18 (800MHz), B19 (800MHz), B20(800), B25(1900), B26(850), B28(700), B38(2600), B39(1900), B40(2300), B41(2500), B66(AWS-3)
5G support Yes Yes
Bluetooth features LE LE
Bluetooth version 6.0 5.4
DisplayPort Yes Yes
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
Hybrid slot No No
Infrared port Yes No
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
NFC* Yes Yes
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
USB features - Charging- USB-Storage mode- OTG - Charging- USB-Storage mode- OTG
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 3.2
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band- Wi-Fi MiMO- Wi-Fi Direct- Wi-Fi Hotspot- Wi-Fi Display - Dual Band- Wi-Fi MiMO- Wi-Fi Direct- Wi-Fi Hotspot- Wi-Fi Display
Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
eSIM support* Yes Yes

Design and build

Design and build specifications comparison
Specification Oppo Find X9 Pro Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber
Colors White, Gray, Red Black
Drop resistance Good (C) · 90 drops
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-button
Frame material Metal Metal
Height 161.26 mm (6.35 inches) 159.2 mm (6.27 inches)
Rear material Glass
Repairability Good (3.82/5)
Thickness 8.25 mm (0.32 inches) 3.9 mm (0.15 inches)
Waterproof IP69 IP48
Weight 224 g (7.9 oz) 309 g (10.9 oz)
Width 76.46 mm (3.01 inches) 214.1 mm (8.43 inches)

Display

Display specifications comparison
Specification Oppo Find X9 Pro Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (1-120 Hz) Yes
Aspect ratio 20:9 4:3
Contrast ∞ Infinity
Display features - DCI-P3- Always-On Display- DC Dimming - DCI-P3- Always-On Display- DC Dimming
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision Yes, HDR10+
Max rated brightness 1800 nits 1600 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 3600 nits
PPI 450 ppi 269 ppi
PWM 354 Hz
RGB color space 98.3%
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Resolution 1264 x 2780 pixels 1584 x 2160 pixels
Response time 7 ms
Screen protection Gorilla Glass Victus 2 Corning Gorilla Glass Ceramic 2
Screen-to-body ratio 90% 90.9%
Size 6.78 inches 10 inches
Touch sampling rate 240 Hz
Type AMOLED Dynamic AMOLED

DxOMark main camera tests

DxOMark main camera tests specifications comparison
Specification Oppo Find X9 Pro Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Bokeh 180
Samples Photo samples of Oppo Find X9 Pro from DxOMark

Main camera

Main camera specifications comparison
Specification Oppo Find X9 Pro Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
4K video recording Up to 120FPS Up to 60FPS
8K video recording No Up to 30FPS
Angle of widest lens 120° 120°
Aperture f/1.5 f/1.7
Autofocus Laser autofocus Phase autofocus
Camera features - Bokeh mode- Pro mode- RAW support - Bokeh mode- Pro mode- RAW support
Flash LED LED
Focal length 23 mm 24 mm
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 16320 x 12240
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP2) Telephoto: 200 MP3) Ultrawide: 50 MP 1) Standard: 200 MP2) Telephoto: 10 MP3) Ultrawide: 12 MP
Matrix 50 megapixels 200 megapixels
Pixel size 1.22 micron 0.6 micron
Sensor Sony LYT-828 Samsung ISOCELL HP2
Sensor size 1/1.28" (≈ 0.78 inch) 1/1.3" (≈ 0.77 inch)
Slow motion 480 FPS (720p) 120 FPS (1080p)
Stabilization Optical Optical
Zoom Optical, 3x Optical, 3x

Memory

Memory specifications comparison
Specification Oppo Find X9 Pro Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Channels 4 4
Memory card No No
Memory clock 5333 MHz 5300 MHz
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
RAM size 12 GB 16 GB
Storage size 256 GB 512 GB
Storage type UFS 4.1 UFS 4.0

Other

Other specifications comparison
Specification Oppo Find X9 Pro Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Announced October 2025 December 2025
Bundled charger Yes, 80 W Not included
Category Flagship Flagship
Launch price (MSRP) $1299 $2899
Release date October 2025 December 2025
Sensors - Proximity sensor- Gyroscope- Accelerometer- Ambient light sensor- Compass- Fingerprint - Hall-effect sensor- Barometer- Proximity sensor- Gyroscope- Accelerometer- Ambient light sensor- Compass- Fingerprint

Performance

Performance specifications comparison
Specification Oppo Find X9 Pro Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Architecture - 4 cores at 2.7 GHz: C1-Pro- 3 cores at 3.5 GHz: C1-Premium- 1 core at 4.21 GHz: C1-Ultra - 6 cores at 3.53 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix M)- 2 cores at 4.32 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix L)
CPU cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 8 (2 + 6)
Chipset MediaTek Dimensity 9500 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
FLOPS ~5271.5 GFLOPS ~3379.2 GFLOPS
GPU clock 1716 MHz 1100 MHz
GPU shading units 1536 1536
Graphics Mali-G1 Ultra MP12 Adreno 830
L3 cache 16 MB 8 MB
Lithography process 3 nanometers 3 nanometers
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Max clock 4210 MHz 4470 MHz
Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek NPU 990 Hexagon

Recent User Tests

Recent User Tests specifications comparison
Specification Oppo Find X9 Pro Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Date Benchmark
📘 2026-04-03->StevenS GeekBench GPU
📘 2026-04-10(Xx_DuLe_xX) AnTuTu
📘 2026-04-29(Alijka) AnTuTu
📘 2026-05-23(Awie97#) AnTuTu
📘 2026-05-23(Valerij) AnTuTu
📘 2026-07-14(7kxlz) AnTuTu
📘 2026-07-26->FrostbyteX AnTuTu

Selfie camera

Selfie camera specifications comparison
Specification Oppo Find X9 Pro Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No
Megapixels 50 megapixels 10 megapixels
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS
Additional lens 10 MP, f/24, 1/3.0"

Software

Software specifications comparison
Specification Oppo Find X9 Pro Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
OS size 58 GB
OS updates 5 years 7 years
Operating system Android 16 Android 16
ROM ColorOS 16 One UI 8.0
Security updates 6 years 7 years

Sound

Sound specifications comparison
Specification Oppo Find X9 Pro Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Dolby Atmos Yes Yes
FM radio No No
Headphone audio jack No No
Speakers Stereo Stereo

Looking for More Comparisons?

Browse all available head-to-head comparisons or select new devices in the comparison hub.

Browse Smartphones Comparisons → Launch Full Comparison Hub →