Oppo Find X9 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy S25 FE

[ VERDICT ] Winner: Oppo Find X9 Pro (94/100)

Oppo Find X9 Pro leads overall with a score of 94/100 compared to Samsung Galaxy S25 FE (75/100), offering superior measured performance and technical specifications.

Benchmark Performance Comparison

Normalized Lab Scores
Benchmark measurements and scores across compared devices
Benchmark Oppo Find X9 Pro Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Gaming 94.0 Excellent WINNER 66.0 Average
NanoReview Score 94.0 Excellent WINNER 75.0 Good
Performance 97.0 Excellent WINNER 76.0 Good

Detailed Technical Specifications

Battery

Battery specifications comparison
Specification Oppo Find X9 Pro Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Battery cycles 1300 cycles 2000 cycles
Battery type Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) Li-Ion
Bypass charging Yes No
Capacity 7500 mAh 4900 mAh
Fast charging Yes (54% in 30 min) Yes (52% in 30 min)
Full charging time 1:20 hr 1:10 hr
Gaming 10:24 hr 06:03 hr
Max charge power 80 W 45 W
Replaceable No No
Reverse charging Yes, (wireless) Yes, (wireless)
Standby 107 hr 87 hr
Watching video 25:00 hr 14:24 hr
Web browsing 19:04 hr 13:29 hr
Wireless charging Yes (50 W) Yes (25 W)

Benchmarks

Benchmarks specifications comparison
Specification Oppo Find X9 Pro Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
CPU 1098383 714011
Compute Score (GPU) 26944 13755
Data manipulation 13395 13202
GPU 1275843 653511
Graphics score 3009 1840
Graphics test 22 FPS 14 FPS
Memory 378116 303868
Multi-core score 10065 6910
Photo editing 22747 34315
Section 1 55 FPS 37 FPS
Section 2 52 FPS 31 FPS
Section 3 43 FPS 25 FPS
Single-core score 3422 2126
Stability 52% 62%
Total score 3508681 2087886
UX 756339 416496
Video editing 5850 8051
Web score 11183 12949
Writing score 19055 23460

Connectivity

Connectivity specifications comparison
Specification Oppo Find X9 Pro Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
2G network GSM 850/900/1800MHz GSM850, GSM900, DCS1800, PCS1900
3G network WCDMA 1/2/4/5/6/8/19 UMTS B1(2100), B2(1900), B4(AWS), B5(850), B8(900)
4G network LTE 1/2/3/4/5/7/8/12/17/18/19/20/25/26/28/66 LTE B1(2100), B2(1900), B3(1800), B4(AWS), B5(850), B7(2600), B8(900), B12(700), B17(700), B18(800), B19(800), B20(800), B25(1900), B26(850), B28(700), B32(1500), B66(AWS-3)
5G support Yes Yes
Bluetooth features LE LE
Bluetooth version 6.0 5.4
DisplayPort Yes Yes
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Hybrid slot No No
Infrared port Yes No
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
NFC* Yes Yes
Number of SIM* 2 1
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
USB features - Charging- USB-Storage mode- OTG - Charging- USB-Storage mode- OTG
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 3.2 3.2
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band- Wi-Fi MiMO- Wi-Fi Direct- Wi-Fi Hotspot- Wi-Fi Display - Dual Band- Wi-Fi MiMO- Wi-Fi Direct- Wi-Fi Hotspot- Wi-Fi Display
Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
eSIM support* Yes Yes
LTE Cat* 20

Design and build

Design and build specifications comparison
Specification Oppo Find X9 Pro Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Colors White, Gray, Red White, Black, Gray, Blue, Yellow
Drop resistance Good (C) · 90 drops Excellent (A) · 270 drops
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Frame material Metal Metal
Height 161.26 mm (6.35 inches) 161.3 mm (6.35 inches)
Rear material Glass Glass
Repairability Good (3.82/5) Good (3.19/5)
Thickness 8.25 mm (0.32 inches) 7.4 mm (0.29 inches)
Waterproof IP69 IP68
Weight 224 g (7.9 oz) 190 g (6.7 oz)
Width 76.46 mm (3.01 inches) 76.6 mm (3.02 inches)

Display

Display specifications comparison
Specification Oppo Find X9 Pro Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (1-120 Hz) Yes (1-120 Hz)
Aspect ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Contrast ∞ Infinity
Display features - DCI-P3- Always-On Display- DC Dimming - DCI-P3- Always-On Display
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision Yes, HDR10+
Max rated brightness 1800 nits 1300 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 3600 nits 1900 nits
PPI 450 ppi 385 ppi
PWM 354 Hz
RGB color space 98.3%
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Resolution 1264 x 2780 pixels 1080 x 2340 pixels
Response time 7 ms
Screen protection Gorilla Glass Victus 2 Gorilla Glass Victus Plus
Screen-to-body ratio 90% 89.2%
Size 6.78 inches 6.7 inches
Touch sampling rate 240 Hz
Type AMOLED Dynamic AMOLED

DxOMark main camera tests

DxOMark main camera tests specifications comparison
Specification Oppo Find X9 Pro Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Bokeh 180 150
Samples Photo samples of Oppo Find X9 Pro from DxOMark Photo samples of Samsung Galaxy S25 FE from DxOMark

Main camera

Main camera specifications comparison
Specification Oppo Find X9 Pro Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 120FPS
4K video recording Up to 120FPS Up to 120FPS
8K video recording No Up to 30FPS
Angle of widest lens 120° 123°
Aperture f/1.5 f/1.8
Autofocus Laser autofocus Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel)
Camera features - Bokeh mode- Pro mode- RAW support - Bokeh mode- Pro mode
Flash LED LED
Focal length 23 mm 24 mm
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 8160 x 6120
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP2) Telephoto: 200 MP3) Ultrawide: 50 MP 1) Standard: 50 MP2) Telephoto: 8 MP3) Ultrawide: 12 MP
Matrix 50 megapixels 50 megapixels
Pixel size 1.22 micron 1 micron
Sensor Sony LYT-828 Samsung ISOCELL S5KGN3
Sensor size 1/1.28" (≈ 0.78 inch) 1/1.57" (≈ 0.64 inch)
Slow motion 480 FPS (720p) 960 FPS (720p)
Stabilization Optical Optical
Zoom Optical, 3x Optical, 3x

Memory

Memory specifications comparison
Specification Oppo Find X9 Pro Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Channels 4 4
Memory card No No
Memory clock 5333 MHz
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
RAM size 12 GB 8 GB
Storage size 256 GB 128 GB
Storage type UFS 4.1 UFS 4.0

Other

Other specifications comparison
Specification Oppo Find X9 Pro Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Announced October 2025 September 2025
Bundled charger Yes, 80 W Not included
Category Flagship Flagship
Launch price (MSRP) $1299 $649
Release date October 2025 September 2025
Sensors - Proximity sensor- Gyroscope- Accelerometer- Ambient light sensor- Compass- Fingerprint - Gyroscope- Accelerometer- Ambient light sensor- Compass- Fingerprint

Performance

Performance specifications comparison
Specification Oppo Find X9 Pro Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Architecture - 4 cores at 2.7 GHz: C1-Pro- 3 cores at 3.5 GHz: C1-Premium- 1 core at 4.21 GHz: C1-Ultra - 4 cores at 1.95 GHz: Cortex-A520- 3 cores at 2.6 GHz: Cortex-A720- 2 cores at 2.9 GHz: Cortex-A720- 1 core at 3.21 GHz: Cortex-X4
CPU cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 10 (1 + 2 + 3 + 4)
Chipset MediaTek Dimensity 9500 Samsung Exynos 2400
FLOPS ~5271.5 GFLOPS ~3406.8 GFLOPS
GPU clock 1716 MHz 1095 MHz
GPU shading units 1536 768
Graphics Mali-G1 Ultra MP12 Xclipse 940
L3 cache 16 MB 8 MB
Lithography process 3 nanometers 4 nanometers
Manufacturing TSMC Samsung
Max clock 4210 MHz 3200 MHz
Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek NPU 990 Yes

Recent User Tests

Recent User Tests specifications comparison
Specification Oppo Find X9 Pro Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Date Benchmark Benchmark
📘 2026-04-03->StevenS GeekBench GPU
📘 2026-04-10(Xx_DuLe_xX) AnTuTu
📘 2026-04-29(Alijka) AnTuTu
📘 2026-05-23(Awie97#) AnTuTu
📘 2026-05-23(Valerij) AnTuTu
📘 2026-07-14(7kxlz) AnTuTu
📘 2026-07-26->FrostbyteX AnTuTu
📘 2026-07-17(Ameer) AnTuTu
📘 2026-07-27(DozaWD) AnTuTu
📘 2026-08-03(Halil) GeekBench CPU
📘 2026-08-08(Ajr) AnTuTu
📘 2026-08-09->JamesPatrick AnTuTu
📘 2026-08-17(Neto) AnTuTu

Selfie camera

Selfie camera specifications comparison
Specification Oppo Find X9 Pro Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No
Megapixels 50 megapixels 12 megapixels
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS

Software

Software specifications comparison
Specification Oppo Find X9 Pro Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
OS size 58 GB 23.8 GB
OS updates 5 years 7 years
Operating system Android 16 Android 16
ROM ColorOS 16 One UI 8.0
Security updates 6 years 7 years

Sound

Sound specifications comparison
Specification Oppo Find X9 Pro Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Dolby Atmos Yes Yes
FM radio No No
Headphone audio jack No No
Speakers Stereo Stereo

Looking for More Comparisons?

Browse all available head-to-head comparisons or select new devices in the comparison hub.

Browse Smartphones Comparisons → Launch Full Comparison Hub →