Oppo Find X9 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy S10

[ VERDICT ] Winner: Oppo Find X9 Pro (94/100)

Oppo Find X9 Pro leads overall with a score of 94/100 compared to Samsung Galaxy S10 (54/100), offering superior measured performance and technical specifications.

Benchmark Performance Comparison

Normalized Lab Scores
Benchmark measurements and scores across compared devices
Benchmark Oppo Find X9 Pro Samsung Galaxy S10
Gaming 94.0 Excellent WINNER 22.0 Poor
NanoReview Score 94.0 Excellent WINNER 54.0 Below Average
Performance 97.0 Excellent WINNER 39.0 Poor

Detailed Technical Specifications

Battery

Battery specifications comparison
Specification Oppo Find X9 Pro Samsung Galaxy S10
Battery cycles 1300 cycles
Battery type Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) Li-Po
Bypass charging Yes
Capacity 7500 mAh 3400 mAh
Fast charging Yes (54% in 30 min) Yes, Samsung Adaptive Fast Charge (50% in 30 min)
Full charging time 1:20 hr 1:35 hr
Gaming 10:24 hr 05:16 hr
Max charge power 80 W 15 W
Replaceable No No
Reverse charging Yes, (wireless) Yes, (wireless)
Standby 107 hr 73 hr
Watching video 25:00 hr 14:48 hr
Web browsing 19:04 hr 13:03 hr
Wireless charging Yes (50 W) Yes, Qi/PMA (9 W)

Benchmarks

Benchmarks specifications comparison
Specification Oppo Find X9 Pro Samsung Galaxy S10
CPU 1098383 303198
Compute Score (GPU) 26944 4837
Data manipulation 13395 7663
GPU 1275843 133774
Graphics score 3009 367
Graphics test 22 FPS 3 FPS
Memory 378116 148749
Multi-core score 10065 2961
Photo editing 22747 18351
Section 1 55 FPS
Section 2 52 FPS
Section 3 43 FPS
Single-core score 3422 986
Stability 52% 81%
Total score 3508681 747257
UX 756339 161536
Video editing 5850 5772
Web score 11183 7433
Writing score 19055 10349

Connectivity

Connectivity specifications comparison
Specification Oppo Find X9 Pro Samsung Galaxy S10
2G network GSM 850/900/1800MHz GSM 850, GSM 900, GSM 1800, GSM 1900
3G network WCDMA 1/2/4/5/6/8/19 HSDPA 850, HSDPA 900, HSDPA 1900, HSDPA 2100
4G network LTE 1/2/3/4/5/7/8/12/17/18/19/20/25/26/28/66 LTE 700, LTE 2300, LTE 1900, LTE 900, LTE 1700, LTE 850, LTE 2600, LTE 1800, LTE 800, LTE 2100, LTE 2500
5G support Yes No
Bluetooth features LE PBAP/PAB, PAN, OPP, MAP, LE, HSP, HID, HFP, DIP, AVRCP, A2DP
Bluetooth version 6.0 5
DisplayPort Yes
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
Hybrid slot No Yes
Infrared port Yes No
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
NFC* Yes Yes
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
USB features - Charging- USB-Storage mode- OTG - Charging- USB-Storage mode- OTG
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 3.2 3.1
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band- Wi-Fi MiMO- Wi-Fi Direct- Wi-Fi Hotspot- Wi-Fi Display - Dual Band- Wi-Fi Direct- Wi-Fi Hotspot
Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ax)
eSIM support* Yes No
LTE Cat* 20

Design and build

Design and build specifications comparison
Specification Oppo Find X9 Pro Samsung Galaxy S10
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber
Colors White, Gray, Red White, Black, Blue, Green
Drop resistance Good (C) · 90 drops
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Frame material Metal Metal
Height 161.26 mm (6.35 inches) 149.9 mm (5.9 inches)
Rear material Glass Glass
Repairability Good (3.82/5)
Thickness 8.25 mm (0.32 inches) 7.8 mm (0.31 inches)
Waterproof IP69 IP68
Weight 224 g (7.9 oz) 157 g (5.54 oz)
Width 76.46 mm (3.01 inches) 70.4 mm (2.77 inches)

Display

Display specifications comparison
Specification Oppo Find X9 Pro Samsung Galaxy S10
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (1-120 Hz) No
Aspect ratio 20:9 19:9
Contrast ∞ Infinity ∞ Infinity
Display features - DCI-P3- Always-On Display- DC Dimming - DCI-P3- Always-On Display
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision Yes, HDR10+
Max rated brightness 1800 nits 1215 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 3600 nits
PPI 450 ppi 551 ppi
PWM 354 Hz 240 Hz
RGB color space 98.3% 98.1%
Refresh rate 120 Hz 60 Hz
Resolution 1264 x 2780 pixels 1440 x 3040 pixels
Response time 7 ms 4.8 ms
Screen protection Gorilla Glass Victus 2 Corning Gorilla Glass 6
Screen-to-body ratio 90% 88%
Size 6.78 inches 6.1 inches
Touch sampling rate 240 Hz
Type AMOLED Dynamic AMOLED

DxOMark main camera tests

DxOMark main camera tests specifications comparison
Specification Oppo Find X9 Pro Samsung Galaxy S10
Bokeh 180
Samples Photo samples of Oppo Find X9 Pro from DxOMark

Main camera

Main camera specifications comparison
Specification Oppo Find X9 Pro Samsung Galaxy S10
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 240FPS
4K video recording Up to 120FPS Up to 60FPS
8K video recording No No
Angle of widest lens 120° 123°
Aperture f/1.5 f/1.5 - 2.4
Autofocus Laser autofocus Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel)
Camera features - Bokeh mode- Pro mode- RAW support - Bokeh mode- Pro mode- RAW support
Flash LED Dual LED
Focal length 23 mm 26 mm
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 4000 x 3000
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP2) Telephoto: 200 MP3) Ultrawide: 50 MP 1) Standard: 12 MP2) Telephoto: 12 MP3) Ultrawide: 16 MP
Matrix 50 megapixels 12 megapixels
Pixel size 1.22 micron 1.4 micron
Sensor Sony LYT-828 Samsung SAK2L4
Sensor size 1/1.28" (≈ 0.78 inch) 1/2.55" (≈ 0.39 inch)
Slow motion 480 FPS (720p) 960 FPS (720p)
Stabilization Optical Optical
Zoom Optical, 3x Optical, 2x

Memory

Memory specifications comparison
Specification Oppo Find X9 Pro Samsung Galaxy S10
Channels 4 2
Memory card No MicroSD
Memory clock 5333 MHz 2133 MHz
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR4X
RAM size 12 GB 6 GB
Storage size 256 GB 128 GB
Storage type UFS 4.1 UFS 2.1
Memory card max size Up to 512 GB

Other

Other specifications comparison
Specification Oppo Find X9 Pro Samsung Galaxy S10
Announced October 2025 February 2019
Bundled charger Yes, 80 W
Category Flagship Flagship
Launch price (MSRP) $1299 $900
Release date October 2025 March 2019
Sensors - Proximity sensor- Gyroscope- Accelerometer- Ambient light sensor- Compass- Fingerprint - Hall-effect sensor- Barometer- Proximity sensor- Gyroscope- Accelerometer- Ambient light sensor- Compass- Fingerprint
SAR (body) 1.59 W/kg
SAR (head) 0.48 W/kg
Successor -Samsung Galaxy S25 FE

Performance

Performance specifications comparison
Specification Oppo Find X9 Pro Samsung Galaxy S10
Architecture - 4 cores at 2.7 GHz: C1-Pro- 3 cores at 3.5 GHz: C1-Premium- 1 core at 4.21 GHz: C1-Ultra - 4 cores at 1.95 GHz: Cortex-A55- 2 cores at 2.31 GHz: Cortex-A75- 2 cores at 2.73 GHz: Mongoose M4
CPU cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 8 (2 + 2 + 4)
Chipset MediaTek Dimensity 9500 Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 9820
FLOPS ~5271.5 GFLOPS ~404.4 GFLOPS
GPU clock 1716 MHz 702 MHz
GPU shading units 1536 288
Graphics Mali-G1 Ultra MP12 Mali G76 MP12
L3 cache 16 MB
Lithography process 3 nanometers 8 nanometers
Manufacturing TSMC Samsung
Max clock 4210 MHz 2730 MHz
Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek NPU 990 Yes

Recent User Tests

Recent User Tests specifications comparison
Specification Oppo Find X9 Pro Samsung Galaxy S10
Date Benchmark Benchmark
📘 2026-04-03->StevenS GeekBench GPU
📘 2026-04-10(Xx_DuLe_xX) AnTuTu
📘 2026-04-29(Alijka) AnTuTu
📘 2026-05-23(Awie97#) AnTuTu
📘 2026-05-23(Valerij) AnTuTu
📘 2026-07-14(7kxlz) AnTuTu
📘 2026-07-26->FrostbyteX AnTuTu
📘 2026-01-24(P1rat) AnTuTu
📘 2026-02-17(ENOCH765LT) AnTuTu
📘 2026-02-19(GAZYX) AnTuTu
📘 2026-03-10(Penguin (Kookuha)) AnTuTu
📘 2026-04-01(LowbudgetNontecktoker) AnTuTu
📘 2026-04-10(Dio) AnTuTu
📘 2026-07-11->Sergo67 AnTuTu
📘 2026-08-13(ODIN_MODE) GeekBench CPU

Selfie camera

Selfie camera specifications comparison
Specification Oppo Find X9 Pro Samsung Galaxy S10
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No
Megapixels 50 megapixels 10 megapixels
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS

Software

Software specifications comparison
Specification Oppo Find X9 Pro Samsung Galaxy S10
OS size 58 GB 9.5 GB
OS updates 5 years 2 years
Operating system Android 16 Android 9.0 (Can be upgraded to Android 12)
ROM ColorOS 16 One UI 4.0
Security updates 6 years 4 years

Sound

Sound specifications comparison
Specification Oppo Find X9 Pro Samsung Galaxy S10
Dolby Atmos Yes Yes
FM radio No No
Headphone audio jack No Yes
Speakers Stereo Stereo

Looking for More Comparisons?

Browse all available head-to-head comparisons or select new devices in the comparison hub.

Browse Smartphones Comparisons → Launch Full Comparison Hub →