Oppo Find X9 Ultra vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
[ VERDICT ]
Winner: Oppo Find X9 Ultra (96/100)
Oppo Find X9 Ultra leads overall with a score of 96/100 compared to Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T (38/100), offering superior measured performance and technical specifications.
Benchmark Performance Comparison
Normalized Lab Scores| Benchmark | Oppo Find X9 Ultra | Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | 96.0 Excellent WINNER | 13.0 Poor |
| NanoReview Score | 96.0 Excellent WINNER | 38.0 Poor |
| Performance | 99.0 Excellent WINNER | 18.0 Poor |
Detailed Technical Specifications
Battery
| Specification | Oppo Find X9 Ultra | Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T |
|---|---|---|
| Battery type | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) | Li-Ion |
| Bypass charging | Yes | — |
| Capacity | 7050 mAh | 4000 mAh |
| Fast charging | Yes (75% in 30 min) | Yes (50% in 35 min) |
| Full charging time | 0:45 hr | 2:05 hr |
| Gaming | 08:23 hr | 05:03 hr |
| Max charge power | 100 W | 18 W |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Reverse charging | Yes, (wireless) | No |
| Standby | 144 hr | 95 hr |
| Watching video | 26:15 hr | 11:48 hr |
| Web browsing | 16:45 hr | 08:01 hr |
| Wireless charging | Yes (50 W) | No |
Benchmarks
| Specification | Oppo Find X9 Ultra | Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T |
|---|---|---|
| CPU | 1184661 | 145861 |
| Compute Score (GPU) | 27916 | 305 |
| GPU | 1577144 | 23955 |
| Memory | 509054 | 77887 |
| Multi-core score | 10744 | 1128 |
| Single-core score | 3536 | 321 |
| Total score | 4231988 | 350459 |
| UX | 961129 | 102756 |
| Data manipulation | — | 5081 |
| Photo editing | — | 11723 |
| Video editing | — | 4881 |
| Web score | — | 5852 |
| Writing score | — | 6462 |
Connectivity
| Specification | Oppo Find X9 Ultra | Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T |
|---|---|---|
| 2G network | GSM 850/900/1800/1900MHz | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 2100 / 2600 / 1900 / 2000 / 2300 / 2500 |
| 3G network | WCDMA 1/2/4/5/6/8/19 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G network | LTE 1/2/3/4/5/7/8/12/13/17/18/19/20/25/26/28/32/66/71 | LTE 850 / 900 / 1800 / 2100 / 2600 / 1900 / 2000 / 2300 / 2500 |
| 5G support | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE, HID, A2DP |
| Bluetooth version | 6.0 | 5 |
| DisplayPort | Yes | — |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | 2 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| USB features | - Charging- USB-Storage mode- OTG | - Charging- USB-Storage mode- OTG |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 2 |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band- Wi-Fi MiMO- Wi-Fi Direct- Wi-Fi Hotspot- Wi-Fi Display | - Dual Band- Wi-Fi Direct- Wi-Fi Hotspot- Wi-Fi Display |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 b/g/n/ac) |
| eSIM support* | Yes | No |
| LTE Cat* | — | 12 |
Design and build
| Specification | Oppo Find X9 Ultra | Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T |
|---|---|---|
| Advanced cooling | Vapor chamber | — |
| Colors | White, Green, Orange | White, Gray, Blue |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-display | Yes, rear |
| Frame material | Metal | Plastic |
| Height | 163.16 mm (6.42 inches) | 161.1 mm (6.34 inches) |
| Rear material | Glass | Glass |
| Thickness | 8.65 mm (0.34 inches) | 8.6 mm (0.34 inches) |
| Waterproof | IP69 | No |
| Weight | 235 g (8.29 oz) | 200 g (7.05 oz) |
| Width | 76.97 mm (3.03 inches) | 75.4 mm (2.97 inches) |
Display
| Specification | Oppo Find X9 Ultra | Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T |
|---|---|---|
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (1-120 Hz) | No |
| Aspect ratio | 19.8:9 | 19.5:9 |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinity | 1163:1 |
| Display features | - DCI-P3- Always-On Display- DC Dimming | — |
| HDR support | Yes, Dolby Vision | No |
| Max rated brightness | 1800 nits | 500 nits |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | 3600 nits | — |
| PPI | 510 ppi | 409 ppi |
| PWM | 90 Hz | Not detected |
| RGB color space | 99.5% | 99.3% |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3168 pixels | 1080 x 2340 pixels |
| Response time | 1 ms | 46.4 ms |
| Screen protection | Gorilla Glass Victus 2 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90% | 80.3% |
| Size | 6.82 inches | 6.3 inches |
| Touch sampling rate | 300 Hz | — |
| Type | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
DxOMark main camera tests
| Specification | Oppo Find X9 Ultra | Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T |
|---|---|---|
| Bokeh | 185 | — |
| Samples | Photo samples of Oppo Find X9 Ultra from DxOMark | — |
Main camera
| Specification | Oppo Find X9 Ultra | Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p video recording | Up to 240FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| 4K video recording | Up to 120FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| 8K video recording | Up to 30FPS | No |
| Angle of widest lens | 120° | 120° |
| Aperture | f/1.5 | f/1.8 |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode- Pro mode | - Bokeh mode- Pro mode |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Focal length | 23 mm | 26 mm |
| Image resolution | 16320 x 12240 | 8000 x 6000 |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 200 MP2) Telephoto: 200 MP3) Telephoto: 50 MP4) Ultrawide: 50 MP | 1) Standard: 48 MP2) Ultrawide: 8 MP3) Macro: 2 MP4) Depth: 2 MP |
| Matrix | 200 megapixels | 48 megapixels |
| Pixel size | 0.7 micron | 0.8 micron |
| Sensor | Sony LYTIA-901 | Samsung S5KGM1 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.12" (≈ 0.89 inch) | 1/2" (≈ 0.5 inch) |
| Slow motion | 480 FPS (720p) | 240 FPS (720p) |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| Zoom | Optical, 10x | Digital |
Memory
| Specification | Oppo Find X9 Ultra | Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T |
|---|---|---|
| Channels | 4 | 2 |
| Memory card | No | MicroSD |
| Memory clock | 5300 MHz | 1866 MHz |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X |
| RAM size | 12 GB | 3 GB |
| Storage size | 256 GB | 32 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory card max size | — | Up to 256 GB |
Other
| Specification | Oppo Find X9 Ultra | Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | April 2026 | November 2019 |
| Bundled charger | Not included | — |
| Category | Flagship | Mid-range |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1299 | $216 |
| Release date | May 2026 | December 2019 |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor- Gyroscope- Accelerometer- Ambient light sensor- Compass- Fingerprint | - Proximity sensor- Gyroscope- Accelerometer- Ambient light sensor- Compass- Fingerprint |
| SAR (body) | — | 1.3 W/kg |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.74 W/kg |
Performance
| Specification | Oppo Find X9 Ultra | Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | - 6 cores at 3.63 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Performance- 2 cores at 4.61 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Prime | - 4 cores at 1.8 GHz: Kryo 260 Silver (Cortex-A53)- 4 cores at 2 GHz: Kryo 260 Gold (Cortex-A73) |
| CPU cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (4 + 4) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 |
| FLOPS | ~3686.4 GFLOPS | ~243.2 GFLOPS |
| GPU clock | 1200 MHz | 950 MHz |
| GPU shading units | 1536 | 128 |
| Graphics | Adreno 840 | Adreno 610 |
| L3 cache | 12 MB | — |
| Lithography process | 3 nanometers | 11 nanometers |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | Samsung |
| Max clock | 4600 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Hexagon | Hexagon 686 |
Recent User Tests
| Specification | Oppo Find X9 Ultra | Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T |
|---|---|---|
| Date | Benchmark | Benchmark |
| 📘 2026-07-05(ak26ru) | AnTuTu | — |
| 📘 2026-07-15(IlyaLub) | AnTuTu | — |
| 📘 2026-07-19(KY.w) | GeekBench GPU | — |
| 📘 2026-07-21(IlyaLub) | AnTuTu | — |
| 📘 2024-08-10(kyklisheee) | — | GeekBench GPU |
| 📘 2025-10-29(Baster) | — | AnTuTu |
| 📘 2026-07-10(bang) | — | AnTuTu |
Selfie camera
| Specification | Oppo Find X9 Ultra | Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T |
|---|---|---|
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
| Megapixels | 50 megapixels | 13 megapixels |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS |
Software
| Specification | Oppo Find X9 Ultra | Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T |
|---|---|---|
| OS size | 31.6 GB | 8 GB |
| OS updates | 5 years | — |
| Operating system | Android 16 | Android 9.0 (Can be upgraded to Android 11) |
| ROM | ColorOS 16 | MIUI 12.5 |
| Security updates | 6 years | — |
Sound
| Specification | Oppo Find X9 Ultra | Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T |
|---|---|---|
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
| FM radio | No | Yes |
| Headphone audio jack | No | Yes |
| Speakers | Stereo | Mono |
Looking for More Comparisons?
Browse all available head-to-head comparisons or select new devices in the comparison hub.