Honor X7e vs Oppo Find X9 Ultra

[ VERDICT ] Winner: Oppo Find X9 Ultra (96/100)

Oppo Find X9 Ultra leads overall with a score of 96/100 compared to Honor X7e (57/100), offering superior measured performance and technical specifications.

Why choose Oppo Find X9 Ultra:
  • + Higher Gaming score (96 vs 10)
  • + Higher DeviceBenchmark Score score (96 vs 57)
  • + Higher Performance score (99 vs 20)

Benchmark Performance Comparison

Normalized Lab Scores
Benchmark measurements and scores across compared devices
Benchmark Honor X7e Oppo Find X9 Ultra
DeviceBenchmark Score 57.0 Below Average 96.0 Excellent WINNER
Gaming 10.0 Poor 96.0 Excellent WINNER
Performance 20.0 Poor 99.0 Excellent WINNER

Detailed Technical Specifications

Battery

Battery specifications comparison
Specification Honor X7e Oppo Find X9 Ultra
Battery type Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) —
Bypass charging No —
Capacity 7500 mAh 7050 mAh
Fast charging Yes —
Max charge power 45 W —
Replaceable No No
Reverse charging Yes —
Wireless charging No —
Battery type — Silicon-Carbon (Si/C)
Bypass charging — Yes
Fast charging — Yes (75% in 30 min)
Full charging time — 0:45 hr
Gaming — 08:23 hr
Max charge power — 100 W
Reverse charging — Yes, (wireless)
Standby — 144 hr
Watching video — 26:15 hr
Web browsing — 16:45 hr
Wireless charging — Yes (50 W)

Benchmarks

Benchmarks specifications comparison
Specification Honor X7e Oppo Find X9 Ultra
CPU 86390 1184661
Compute Score (GPU) 960 —
GPU 34955 1577144
Memory 77659 509054
Multi-core score 1386 —
Single-core score 399 —
Total score 280245 —
UX 81241 961129
Compute Score (GPU) — 27916
Multi-core score — 10744
Single-core score — 3536
Total score — 4231988

Connectivity

Connectivity specifications comparison
Specification Honor X7e Oppo Find X9 Ultra
5G support No —
Bluetooth features LE —
Bluetooth version 5.1 —
DisplayPort No Yes
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Hybrid slot No —
Infrared port No —
Multi SIM mode Standby —
NFC* Depends on the region —
Number of SIM* 2 —
Type of SIM card Nano —
USB features - Charging- USB-Storage mode- OTG —
USB type USB Type-C —
USB version 2 —
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band- Wi-Fi Direct- Wi-Fi Hotspot- Wi-Fi Display —
Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) —
eSIM support* No —
2G network — GSM 850/900/1800/1900MHz
3G network — WCDMA 1/2/4/5/6/8/19
4G network — LTE 1/2/3/4/5/7/8/12/13/17/18/19/20/25/26/28/32/66/71
5G support — Yes
Bluetooth features — LE
Bluetooth version — 6.0
Hybrid slot — No
Infrared port — Yes
Multi SIM mode — Standby
NFC* — Yes
Number of SIM* — 2
Type of SIM card — Nano
USB features — - Charging- USB-Storage mode- OTG
USB type — USB Type-C
USB version — 3.2
Wi-Fi features — - Dual Band- Wi-Fi MiMO- Wi-Fi Direct- Wi-Fi Hotspot- Wi-Fi Display
Wi-Fi standard — Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
eSIM support* — Yes

Design and build

Design and build specifications comparison
Specification Honor X7e Oppo Find X9 Ultra
Colors Black, Blue, Orange White, Green, Orange
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-button —
Frame material Plastic —
Height 163.9 mm (6.45 inches) 163.16 mm (6.42 inches)
Rear material Plastic —
Thickness 8.3 mm (0.33 inches) 8.65 mm (0.34 inches)
Waterproof IP64 IP69
Weight 200 g (7.05 oz) 235 g (8.29 oz)
Width 75.9 mm (2.99 inches) 76.97 mm (3.03 inches)
Advanced cooling — Vapor chamber
Fingerprint scanner — Yes, in-display
Frame material — Metal
Rear material — Glass

Display

Display specifications comparison
Specification Honor X7e Oppo Find X9 Ultra
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (60-120 Hz) —
Aspect ratio 20:9 —
HDR support No —
Max rated brightness 1010 nits —
PPI 266 ppi 510 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz —
Resolution 720 x 1604 pixels 1440 x 3168 pixels
Screen protection Tempered glass —
Screen-to-body ratio 84.8% —
Size 6.61 inches 6.82 inches
Type TFT LCD AMOLED
Adaptive refresh rate — Yes (1-120 Hz)
Aspect ratio — 19.8:9
Contrast — ∞ Infinity
Display features — - DCI-P3- Always-On Display- DC Dimming
HDR support — Yes, Dolby Vision
Max rated brightness — 1800 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR — 3600 nits
PWM — 90 Hz
RGB color space — 99.5%
Refresh rate — 144 Hz
Response time — 1 ms
Screen protection — Gorilla Glass Victus 2
Screen-to-body ratio — 90%
Touch sampling rate — 300 Hz

Main camera

Main camera specifications comparison
Specification Honor X7e Oppo Find X9 Ultra
1080p video recording Up to 30FPS —
4K video recording No —
8K video recording No —
Aperture f/1.8 f/1.5
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus
Camera features - Bokeh mode- Pro mode —
Flash LED LED
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 —
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP 1) Standard: 200 MP2) Telephoto: 200 MP3) Telephoto: 50 MP4) Ultrawide: 50 MP
Matrix 50 megapixels 200 megapixels
Stabilization Digital Optical
Zoom Digital Optical, 10x
1080p video recording — Up to 240FPS
4K video recording — Up to 120FPS
8K video recording — Up to 30FPS
Angle of widest lens — 120°
Camera features — - Bokeh mode- Pro mode
Focal length — 23 mm
Image resolution — 16320 x 12240
Pixel size — 0.7 micron
Sensor — Sony LYTIA-901
Sensor size — 1/1.12" (≈ 0.89 inch)
Slow motion — 480 FPS (720p)

Memory

Memory specifications comparison
Specification Honor X7e Oppo Find X9 Ultra
Channels 2 4
Memory card No —
Memory clock 1800 MHz —
Memory type LPDDR4X —
RAM size 6 GB —
Storage size 128 GB —
Storage type eMMC 5.1 —
Memory card — No
Memory clock — 5300 MHz
Memory type — LPDDR5X
RAM size — 12 GB
Storage size — 256 GB
Storage type — UFS 4.1

Other

Other specifications comparison
Specification Honor X7e Oppo Find X9 Ultra
Announced May 2026 April 2026
Bundled charger Yes, 45 W —
Category Budget Flagship
Launch price (MSRP) $200 —
Release date May 2026 —
Sensors - Proximity sensor- Gyroscope- Accelerometer- Ambient light sensor- Compass- Fingerprint - Proximity sensor- Gyroscope- Accelerometer- Ambient light sensor- Compass- Fingerprint
Bundled charger — Not included
Launch price (MSRP) — $1299
Release date — May 2026

Performance

Performance specifications comparison
Specification Honor X7e Oppo Find X9 Ultra
Architecture - 6 cores at 1.7 GHz: Cortex-A55- 2 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A75 - 6 cores at 3.63 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Performance- 2 cores at 4.61 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Prime
CPU cores 8 (2 + 6) —
Chipset MediaTek Helio G81 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
FLOPS ~78.7 GFLOPS ~3686.4 GFLOPS
GPU clock 820 MHz —
GPU shading units 48 —
Graphics Mali-G52 MP2 Adreno 840
Lithography process 12 nanometers —
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Max clock 2000 MHz —
Neural processor (NPU) Yes —
CPU cores — 8 (2 + 6)
GPU clock — 1200 MHz
GPU shading units — 1536
L3 cache — 12 MB
Lithography process — 3 nanometers
Max clock — 4600 MHz
Neural processor (NPU) — Hexagon

Selfie camera

Selfie camera specifications comparison
Specification Honor X7e Oppo Find X9 Ultra
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No —
Megapixels 5 megapixels 50 megapixels
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS —
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) — No
Video resolution — 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS

Software

Software specifications comparison
Specification Honor X7e Oppo Find X9 Ultra
OS updates 2 years —
Operating system Android 16 —
ROM MagicOS 10 ColorOS 16
Security updates 3 years —
OS size — 31.6 GB
OS updates — 5 years
Operating system — Android 16
Security updates — 6 years

Sound

Sound specifications comparison
Specification Honor X7e Oppo Find X9 Ultra
Dolby Atmos No —
FM radio No —
Headphone audio jack Yes —
Speakers Mono Stereo
Dolby Atmos — No
FM radio — No
Headphone audio jack — No

DxOMark main camera tests

DxOMark main camera tests specifications comparison
Specification Honor X7e Oppo Find X9 Ultra
Bokeh — 185
Samples — Photo samples of Oppo Find X9 Ultra from DxOMark

Recent User Tests

Recent User Tests specifications comparison
Specification Honor X7e Oppo Find X9 Ultra
Date — Benchmark
📘 2026-07-05(ak26ru) — AnTuTu
📘 2026-07-15(IlyaLub) — AnTuTu
📘 2026-07-19(KY.w) — GeekBench GPU
📘 2026-07-21(IlyaLub) — AnTuTu

Looking for More Comparisons?

Browse all available head-to-head comparisons or select new devices in the comparison hub.

Honor X7e vs Honor Magic 8 Pro Honor X7e vs Oppo Find X9 Pro Honor X7e vs OnePlus 15 Honor X7e vs OnePlus 15T
Browse Smartphones Comparisons → Launch Full Comparison Hub →